Further discussion
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 19:44, 25 October 2021 | ||
| Line 1,106: | Line 1,106: | ||
|
::That isn’t comforting, 1973 is also very difficult for me to understand. As I asked in my thread, why isn’t Newcombe co-#1? 1973 is pre-modern era, not IF award yet, and even no ATP PotY. Yes, there is ATP rankings which says Nastase, but we all know the issue with rankings of that period in particular, but also in general. The fact is, there was no committee award in that year, and being pre-modern period, I think old rules of taking respected authors in consideration should apply for 1973. Tingay said Newcombe was #1, and given the fact that Tingay is very respected and is cited many times, and that Newcombe won Wimbledon, it should hardly be controversial to say that he was also #1, so the year should be shared between Nastase and Newcombe. Check my printable table, it’s still work in progress, I am waiting you to complete #1 stats, but what do you think about the structure? Anyone else? https://smallpdf.com/result#r=49512ada8e12f20c0626694678ca753a&t=share-document Ricardo [[Special:Contributions/93.140.138.137|93.140.138.137]] ([[User talk:93.140.138.137|talk]]) 18:15, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
|
::That isn’t comforting, 1973 is also very difficult for me to understand. As I asked in my thread, why isn’t Newcombe co-#1? 1973 is pre-modern era, not IF award yet, and even no ATP PotY. Yes, there is ATP rankings which says Nastase, but we all know the issue with rankings of that period in particular, but also in general. The fact is, there was no committee award in that year, and being pre-modern period, I think old rules of taking respected authors in consideration should apply for 1973. Tingay said Newcombe was #1, and given the fact that Tingay is very respected and is cited many times, and that Newcombe won Wimbledon, it should hardly be controversial to say that he was also #1, so the year should be shared between Nastase and Newcombe. Check my printable table, it’s still work in progress, I am waiting you to complete #1 stats, but what do you think about the structure? Anyone else? https://smallpdf.com/result#r=49512ada8e12f20c0626694678ca753a&t=share-document Ricardo [[Special:Contributions/93.140.138.137|93.140.138.137]] ([[User talk:93.140.138.137|talk]]) 18:15, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
|
||
| + |
:::You are absolutely correct. Since we are putting all the respected sources instead of cherry picking, Newcombe will also have to put as a No. 1. Obviously with a source. [[User:Fyunck(click)|Fyunck(click)]] ([[User talk:Fyunck(click)|talk]]) 19:44, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
|
||
|
== Tone of Editing in this Article ==
|
== Tone of Editing in this Article ==
|
||