Feedback welcome for article
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 22:12, 2 November 2021 | ||
| Line 703: | Line 703: | ||
|
Hi everyone, I’ve made first large edit by expanding on the stub [[Black Guns Matter]] and would greatly appreciate any feedback. I tried filling out the views and activities of the group and adding more sources in. I’m also curious where else I could look for feedback, the Talk pages of related wikiprojects maybe? Thanks in advance! [[User:LatakiaHill|LatakiaHill]] ([[User talk:LatakiaHill|talk]]) 18:56, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
|
Hi everyone, I’ve made first large edit by expanding on the stub [[Black Guns Matter]] and would greatly appreciate any feedback. I tried filling out the views and activities of the group and adding more sources in. I’m also curious where else I could look for feedback, the Talk pages of related wikiprojects maybe? Thanks in advance! [[User:LatakiaHill|LatakiaHill]] ([[User talk:LatakiaHill|talk]]) 18:56, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
|
||
|
::Hi {{ping|LatakiaHill}}, there is a script available that provides guidance on what consitutes a good source. It might be worth getting hold of it, you can ask at the Afc desk. I removed two non-RS sources. Unreliable. Fox News is one of them. They RS team must have finally lost patience. Hope that helps. All-in-all pretty decent work!! ”'<span style=”text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus”>[[User:scope_creep|<span style=”color:#3399ff”>scope_creep</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:scope_creep#top|Talk]]</sup></span>”’ 19:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
|
::Hi {{ping|LatakiaHill}}, there is a script available that provides guidance on what consitutes a good source. It might be worth getting hold of it, you can ask at the Afc desk. I removed two non-RS sources. Unreliable. Fox News is one of them. They RS team must have finally lost patience. Hope that helps. All-in-all pretty decent work!! ”'<span style=”text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus”>[[User:scope_creep|<span style=”color:#3399ff”>scope_creep</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:scope_creep#top|Talk]]</sup></span>”’ 19:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
|
||
| − |
::::Thanks {{ping|scope_creep}} for the swift and helpful feedback! I understand the removal of the CPAC video, but I have a question regarding the Fox News sources. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Fox_News_(politics_and_science)|perennial sources section on Fox News] and its [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Fox_News_(talk_shows)|talk shows] suggest that they may be quoted for “attributed opinions,” cited with an in-text attribution. Even if Fox News is deemed not factually reliable for politics,
|
+ |
::::Thanks {{ping|scope_creep}} for the swift and helpful feedback! I understand the removal of the CPAC video, but I have a question regarding the Fox News sources. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Fox_News_(politics_and_science)|perennial sources section on Fox News] and its [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Fox_News_(talk_shows)|talk shows] suggest that they may be quoted for “attributed opinions,” cited with an in-text attribution. Even if Fox News is deemed not factually reliable for politics, I think the article makes it clear that I am only citing Fox News for the opinions of the organization’s founder as stated on their show. Would it be appropriate to roll back the Fox News citation, or should it still be dropped? Alternatively, would it be better if I cited a reliable source that quotes or mentions the Fox News segment instead, or maybe is there a way to make it clearer that Fox News is only being referenced here for an attributed opinion? Thanks again for your help. –[[User:LatakiaHill|LatakiaHill]] ([[User talk:LatakiaHill|talk]]) 22:03, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
|
|
== Error contacting the Parsoid/RESTBase server (HTTP 404) ==
|
== Error contacting the Parsoid/RESTBase server (HTTP 404) ==
|
||