もっと詳しく

Shay, Deliso


← Previous revision Revision as of 15:51, 4 January 2022
Line 846: Line 846:
:::::::[[WP:CONTEXTMATTERS]]: The reliability of a source depends on context. Each source must be carefully weighed to judge whether it is reliable for the statement being made in the Wikipedia article and is an appropriate source for that content.
:::::::[[WP:CONTEXTMATTERS]]: The reliability of a source depends on context. Each source must be carefully weighed to judge whether it is reliable for the statement being made in the Wikipedia article and is an appropriate source for that content.
:::::::A source which has seen heavy criticism about their claim for some subjects can not be treated as a valid source for those subjects. Is not that the point of [[WP:CONTEXTMATTERS]]? [[User:Durraz0|Durraz0]] ([[User talk:Durraz0|talk]]) 15:46, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
:::::::A source which has seen heavy criticism about their claim for some subjects can not be treated as a valid source for those subjects. Is not that the point of [[WP:CONTEXTMATTERS]]? [[User:Durraz0|Durraz0]] ([[User talk:Durraz0|talk]]) 15:46, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
::::::::I am unsure one source is enough to show “heavy criticism”, rather it is enough to say “but this has been challenged” in the body.[[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 15:51, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
== Is Rotoscopers reliable ==
== Is Rotoscopers reliable ==