Restore to correct location (why?)
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 23:24, 10 December 2021 | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
|
:*The article, as it stands now, does not violate neutrality policies. [[User:TrangaBellam|TrangaBellam]] ([[User talk:TrangaBellam|talk]]) 16:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
|
:*The article, as it stands now, does not violate neutrality policies. [[User:TrangaBellam|TrangaBellam]] ([[User talk:TrangaBellam|talk]]) 16:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
|
||
|
::* Sorry, no one pinged me, so this is the first I’m seeing these comments. [[User:Valereee|—valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee|talk]]) 16:07, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
|
::* Sorry, no one pinged me, so this is the first I’m seeing these comments. [[User:Valereee|—valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee|talk]]) 16:07, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
|
||
|
}}
|
|||
|
*According to RSP, ”The Daily Beast” is a bit of an online tabloid, and ”HuffPost” is a bit ”eh” when it comes to factually describing American politics. Are we sure that we want to cite the hook to either of these sources alone? I understand the point of the hook is to get someone to click, but if the sources themselves are clickbait then I am not exactly sure that we want to put statements sourced solely to them on the front page of Wikipedia. I’d also hesitate to attach labels of “far-right” from partisan groups where reliability is questionable, even with attribution, since that can very easily run into a [[WP:WEIGHT]] issue. — [[User:Mhawk10|Mhawk10]] ([[User talk:Mhawk10 |talk]]) 18:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
|
*According to RSP, ”The Daily Beast” is a bit of an online tabloid, and ”HuffPost” is a bit ”eh” when it comes to factually describing American politics. Are we sure that we want to cite the hook to either of these sources alone? I understand the point of the hook is to get someone to click, but if the sources themselves are clickbait then I am not exactly sure that we want to put statements sourced solely to them on the front page of Wikipedia. I’d also hesitate to attach labels of “far-right” from partisan groups where reliability is questionable, even with attribution, since that can very easily run into a [[WP:WEIGHT]] issue. — [[User:Mhawk10|Mhawk10]] ([[User talk:Mhawk10 |talk]]) 18:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
|
||
|
**Another smaller thing—the article currently describes Megyn Kelly as conservative. Her own Wikipedia page doesn’t use this characterization (it says she has said she as an independent who votes for candidates in both major parties, but there is no wikivoice characterization of her political stances). The ”Washington Post” source cited in the relevant sentence doesn’t mention Kelly, while the MMFA source doesn’t actually call her conservative. This feels a bit odd BLP-wise. — [[User:Mhawk10|Mhawk10]] ([[User talk:Mhawk10 |talk]]) 18:37, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
|
**Another smaller thing—the article currently describes Megyn Kelly as conservative. Her own Wikipedia page doesn’t use this characterization (it says she has said she as an independent who votes for candidates in both major parties, but there is no wikivoice characterization of her political stances). The ”Washington Post” source cited in the relevant sentence doesn’t mention Kelly, while the MMFA source doesn’t actually call her conservative. This feels a bit odd BLP-wise. — [[User:Mhawk10|Mhawk10]] ([[User talk:Mhawk10 |talk]]) 18:37, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
|
||
|
<!–Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.–>
|
}}<!–Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.–>
|
||